Relative harmony, experience, and digtal tools in networked learning
Below is the eleven minute audio teaser and supplementary component for a symposium I am participating in at the 13th International Conference on Networked Learning (NLC2022), entitled, Phenomenology and networked learning – a found chord. One of the symposium organizers, Mike Johnson, has introduced the audio segment to the symposium beautifully here. The paper I am presenting is entitled, “Re-presencing the digital trace in networked learning design”.This updated audio file reflects on what “a found chord” means to my presentation. As Christopher Alexander inspired how I set out networked learning design in my paper, I thought it would be fitting in this recording to follow a quotation by him, taken from his first volume in The Nature of Order series. In this quotation, he mentions “relative harmony”:
As architects, builders, and artists, we are called upon constantly—every moment of the working day—to make judgments about relative harmony. We are constantly trying to make decisions about what is better and what is worse…What does “relative harmony” mean with respect to our experience of learning about the ever-more digital world and the spatialization of the connection between us and the digital tools we choose to use? From the audio file introduction:
[As Alexander wrote,] ‘We are constantly trying to make decisions about what is better and what is worse. . . ’ To better understand this recording, try to visualize the network in networked learning as ’focus[ing] on node-link structures, foregrounding connectivity . . . and backgrounding such things as spatial relations’ (Goodyear et al. 2016). In this talk, spatial relations refer to the space between ourselves and other people and things around us and the trajectory we engage in to try to understand these others in our learning experience. The purpose of the recording is to reflect on the question of How we can conscientiously assemble technical things, people, activities, and outcomes in networked learning such that we do not deny the world of feeling and experience – which is expressed in time and space – nor deny the world of objects (cf. Goodyear et al. 2016, Whitehead  1978).
The audio recording is divided into four sections: Where are we?, When is technology?, Vector Feeling, and Where are we going?
Right click the .mp3 file below to download.
The transcript can be downloaded below:
- Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: The Nature of Life Volume 1. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Structure.
- Atwood, J. (2007). The software imprinting dilemma. Codinghorror.com.
- Beaty, L., Hodgson, V., Mann, S., & McConnell, D. (2002). Towards E-quality in Networked E-learning in Higher Education. 26 March. Networkedlearningconference.org.
- Dass, R. (1971). Be here now. New Mexico: Lama Foundation.
- Doctorow, C. (2021). Right or left, you should be worried about big tech censorship. EFF.org.
- Engelbart, D. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework. Menlo Park: Stanford Research Institute.
- Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital education in design and practice. Postdigital Science and Education,1(1),132–145.
- Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, London: Continuum.
- Gadamer, H. (2004). Truth and method. London and New York: Continuum.
- Goetz, G. (2021). A song of free software for Stiegler. Educational philosophy and theory: Bernard Stiegler and Education: Experiments in negentropic knowledge, 52(9).
- Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., Bonderup Dohn, N. (2016). Artefacts and activities in the analysis of learning networks. In Ryberg, T., Sinclair, C., Bayne. S. & de Laat, M. (Eds.) Research, Boundaries, and Policy in Networked Learning. (pp. 93-110). Switzerland: Springer.
- Goodyear, P. & Retalis, S. (2010). Learning, technology and design. In Goodyear, P. & Retalis, S. (Eds.). Technology-Enhanced Learning: Design patterns and pattern languages. (pp. 1–27). Roterdam: Sense Publishers.
- Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2018). The epistemic practice of networked learning. In M. Bajić, N. B. Dohn, M. de Laat, P. Jandrić, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Networked Learning 2018 (pp. 455–464). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0029-0.
- Magrini, J. (2002). Phenomenology for Educators: Max van Manen and “Human Science” Research”, Philosophy Scholarship Paper 32. Note: I wrote about this paper in a post on digital work and the ethic of care.
- Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Epistemic fluency and professional education: Innovation, knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative, III. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
- Stiegler, B. (2018). The Neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press.
- Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Maurice Temple Smith.
- Whitehead, A. ([1929 ] 1978). Process and reality. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs.
Page generated 02G03. Last edited 02O10.